Page 2 of 6

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 15 Nov 2017 16:59
by Vortex
yep!

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 00:04
by Jatsko
Wait

Peter Navarre Crecy


Peter Navarre Crecy

PNC

PNC = point 'n click

PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation

The game was created to test how good Game Maker is

This game isn't canon

it's a giant meta joke

bam

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 00:06
by Empoeria
confirmed








please say it is so

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 07:56
by Vortex
seriously...?
XD

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 08:16
by MateuszSkutnik
Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.
Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. :D Gimme that cookie back.

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 10:13
by Augustus
MateuszSkutnik wrote:
Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.
Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. :D Gimme that cookie back.
I have to imagine yet how much Kilo cookies I got to send you o.o

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 13:21
by Jatsko
In the absence of an actual answer to my question about canonicity, yes, I thought I would have a bit of fun. I now know not to ask direct simple questions to help us find answers in the future.

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 13:57
by Augustus
Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik :D I know ya are close :D

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 15:16
by Jatsko
Ko9 wrote:Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik :D I know ya are close :D
...I'm not trying to "outsmart" Mateusz, just asking a simple question, seeing him evade an answer, and then deciding to have a bit of fun.

My apologies if I'm coming across as someone who's tired of getting more and more pieces of this puzzle without any actual meaningful connections. I'm tired of playing the developer. I just want to play games that make sense.

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Posted: 16 Nov 2017 15:53
by Sundex
Eh. I don't blame you. But some aspects should be considered. Although the game isn't canonical, it can still help us in our studies. How? That is for every individual who reads this to figure out for themselves.

That being said, I do hope for a game to reveal certain questions I have. (one of which I have already asked Mateusz)