Off course. There's Henry O'Toole, but that isn't to say that they created the plan.Also, I just remembered: Liz's Note in Sub7, the SubNet based after the Garden plans. She mentioned a "They," so there must be actual Architects.
The Abacus' Theories
-
- wisdom crystal finder
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41
Re: The Abacus' Theories
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
- Anteroinen
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
- Location: Finland
Re: The Abacus' Theories
I have always thought the architects mentioned came after Henry O'Toole.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
-
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 19:46
Re: The Abacus' Theories
Unless it is Henry O'Toole, and it goes along with the whole theme of the Timeline being confusing.
Again, I ask: ...What?They probably do stuff like this, except it do in the Submachine:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WCr-l9naPmE
But the Plan is part of the SubNet, so who did create the Plan if not the architect who created the SubNet? I would say O'Toole is somewhere involved, he's built the Lighthouse and the Winter Palace after all.Off course. There's Henry O'Toole, but that isn't to say that they created the plan.
- Anteroinen
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
- Location: Finland
Re: The Abacus' Theories
I have thought about it rather like this:But the Plan is part of the SubNet, so who did create the Plan if not the architect who created the SubNet? I would say O'Toole is somewhere involved, he's built the Lighthouse and the Winter Palace after all.Off course. There's Henry O'Toole, but that isn't to say that they created the plan.
1) Various locations across the layers are created through unknown means, unrelated to any people that we know about - the machine predates Mur, Liz and the Fourth Dynasty. The Plan, at least in it's complete form, does not exist.
2) Humans enter the subnet during the building of the gardens. Research is begun and layers are discovered. New locations (not submachines per se) are built between and around pre-existing, natural submachines. This is the era of architects; the plan is created.
3) Everything goes wrong, due to three thing as far as I can tell: the collapse, caused by Murtaugh; the expansion, caused by the computer; and the corrosion, caused by loops and other space-distorting effects, to which karma portal are also included, I suppose.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
- ENIHCAMBUS
- karma portal traveller
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: 04 Feb 2013 22:17
- Location: Pastel Lands.
Re: The Abacus' Theories
Henry only maked the Palace and the Lighthouse.
ENIHCAMBUS: State of the Art Scanning!
-
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 19:46
Re: The Abacus' Theories
That seems the case, but then is it safe to say The Plan is a natural occurence, yet built by the Architects? How can The Plan both exist beforehand and yet later be built by the Architects? Unless "The Plan" is the term given to the formation of the Layers, not the creation of the Layers themselves.Anteroinen wrote:I have thought about it rather like this:But the Plan is part of the SubNet, so who did create the Plan if not the architect who created the SubNet? I would say O'Toole is somewhere involved, he's built the Lighthouse and the Winter Palace after all.Off course. There's Henry O'Toole, but that isn't to say that they created the plan.
1) Various locations across the layers are created through unknown means, unrelated to any people that we know about - the machine predates Mur, Liz and the Fourth Dynasty. The Plan, at least in it's complete form, does not exist.
2) Humans enter the subnet during the building of the gardens. Research is begun and layers are discovered. New locations (not submachines per se) are built between and around pre-existing, natural submachines. This is the era of architects; the plan is created.
3) Everything goes wrong, due to three thing as far as I can tell: the collapse, caused by Murtaugh; the expansion, caused by the computer; and the corrosion, caused by loops and other space-distorting effects, to which karma portal are also included, I suppose.
And tell me how you can confirm that.Henry only maked the Palace and the Lighthouse.
Before The Core, we didn't know how much else O'Toole was involved in.
- Anteroinen
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
- Location: Finland
Re: The Abacus' Theories
That is what I'm proposing.Unless "The Plan" is the term given to the formation of the Layers, not the creation of the Layers themselves.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
-
- wisdom crystal finder
- Posts: 2877
- Joined: 04 Dec 2012 10:41
Re: The Abacus' Theories
In my theory The Architects are the Creator(s) of the submachine or the sentient A.I. (i.e. the submachine) or both. For all I know, both interpretations could be correct.
We can't be sure of that.Henry only made the Palace and the Lighthouse.
How can you be sure that the machine predates the Fourth Dynasty?1) Various locations across the layers are created through unknown means, unrelated to any people that we know about - the machine predates Mur, Liz and the Fourth Dynasty. The Plan, at least in it's complete form, does not exist.
2) Humans enter the subnet during the building of the gardens. Research is begun and layers are discovered. New locations (not submachines per se) are built between and around pre-existing, natural submachines. This is the era of architects; the plan is created.
Balance is imperative; without it, total collapse and destruction is imminent.
- Anteroinen
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
- Location: Finland
Re: The Abacus' Theories
Well, if they found it, it quite certainly does. Unless there is some sort of time machine mechanic involved, which I wish not to consider at this moment.How can you be sure that the machine predates the Fourth Dynasty?1) Various locations across the layers are created through unknown means, unrelated to any people that we know about - the machine predates Mur, Liz and the Fourth Dynasty. The Plan, at least in it's complete form, does not exist.
2) Humans enter the subnet during the building of the gardens. Research is begun and layers are discovered. New locations (not submachines per se) are built between and around pre-existing, natural submachines. This is the era of architects; the plan is created.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
-
- subnet traveller
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: 03 Dec 2012 19:46
Re: The Abacus' Theories
Strangely, I'm okay with that interpretation.Anteroinen wrote:That is what I'm proposing.Unless "The Plan" is the term given to the formation of the Layers, not the creation of the Layers themselves.
O_o You said "Submachine" twice...XD Now if you mean The Computer ("sentient A.I." being Computer), I don't think they would then be called Architects for creating the Computer. They'd be called "the Programmers" or something.In my theory The Architects are the Creator(s) of the submachine or the sentient A.I. (i.e. the submachine) or both. For all I know, both interpretations could be correct.
And back to basics: The Architects are behind The Plan, although possibly creating the SubNet too. You can be right though: The same Architects may have built both the SubNet and The Plan, or at least belonged to the same creation team i.e. The King's Architects.
Mateusz has mentioned a time machine, as you're well aware, which just makes everything more confusing regardless of whether you intend it to be or not.Well, if they found it, it quite certainly does. Unless there is some sort of time machine mechanic involved, which I wish not to consider at this moment.
And now, I meant to ask: What "machine" are we referring to? The Computer? Certainly not the "Submachine," that's just the term it was given.