Submachine Wiki

User avatar
Sublevel 113
layer restorer
Posts: 16576
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Sublevel 113 »

maybe we tell Mateusz? again?
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12140
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Vortex »

I don't know, it doesn't really bother me too much XD
User avatar
reed
subnet technician
Posts: 392
Joined: 07 Oct 2016 14:18
Location: the loop

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by reed »

So, I had this thought. It would be really convenient if every theory had an abstract - a couple of sentences describing the essence of a theory. Since it's not implemented already, it's probably not considered a good idea, but still.
no, you're not getting out of here. no way.

operatorsandthings.tumblr.com
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12140
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Vortex »

Hm, not a bad idea. Though we could run the risk of misinterpreting the author.
User avatar
reed
subnet technician
Posts: 392
Joined: 07 Oct 2016 14:18
Location: the loop

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by reed »

Oh indeed, haven't thought of that.
no, you're not getting out of here. no way.

operatorsandthings.tumblr.com
User avatar
Anteroinen
subnet traveller
Posts: 1341
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 18:43
Location: Finland

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Anteroinen »

In addition to that problem, many theories are very short, so putting down "Submachine is alive" or something as the abstract would just look silly.
"We didn't leave the Stone Age, because we ran out of stones."
User avatar
Sublevel 113
layer restorer
Posts: 16576
Joined: 11 Dec 2012 20:23

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Sublevel 113 »

Did you see SubVerse's DarkRose's theory? XD
User avatar
Jatsko
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5997
Joined: 26 May 2014 11:20

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Jatsko »

So, now that SubVerse HD is out, time to ask the next question:

Do we want to do another voting session?

I remember throwing this idea around before, and I want to gauge your opinions on it. It is technically another game release, and afaik it's tradition to hold a theory voting session after each game release.

Of course, now the theory voting is split into regular and Jailbreak (thanks to me) which only covers confirmed and debunked.

So, do we want to hold another theory voting session? And if so, which one? I ask because I've seen a spike in activity.

For your interests I've provided links to both voting pages, just so you can see what we're dealing with:

http://submachine.wikia.com/wiki/Theory_voting
http://submachine.wikia.com/wiki/Theory ... _jailbreak


ADD: Also, new poll!
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12140
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Vortex »

Since there's not a big change between the online and HD versions, I think we should wait until it gets expanded a little more so that we can gather enough new info, since right now there's only around 5 unvoted theories and for the rest we'd we working with the same info we had after Sub10.
User avatar
Jatsko
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5997
Joined: 26 May 2014 11:20

Re: Submachine Wiki

Post by Jatsko »

Sounds reasonable.
Post Reply