The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12140
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Vortex »

yep!
User avatar
Jatsko
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5997
Joined: 26 May 2014 11:20

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Jatsko »

Wait

Peter Navarre Crecy


Peter Navarre Crecy

PNC

PNC = point 'n click

PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation

The game was created to test how good Game Maker is

This game isn't canon

it's a giant meta joke

bam
User avatar
Empoeria
the Architect's apprentice
Posts: 457
Joined: 13 Sep 2016 08:16

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Empoeria »

confirmed








please say it is so
User avatar
Vortex
Murtaugh's hunter
Posts: 12140
Joined: 03 Dec 2012 17:11
Location: Spain

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Vortex »

seriously...?
XD
User avatar
MateuszSkutnik
The Architect
Posts: 806
Joined: 20 Nov 2012 18:03

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by MateuszSkutnik »

Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.
Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. :D Gimme that cookie back.
User avatar
Augustus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2274
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 13:20

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Augustus »

MateuszSkutnik wrote:
Apocrypha wrote:PNC evaluation = Point 'n click evaluation
The game was created to test how good Game Maker is.
Great deduction. Respect. Here, have a cookie.
Apocrypha wrote: This game isn't canon - it's a giant meta joke
How did you arrive at that conclusion is beyond me. :D Gimme that cookie back.
I have to imagine yet how much Kilo cookies I got to send you o.o
User avatar
Jatsko
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5997
Joined: 26 May 2014 11:20

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Jatsko »

In the absence of an actual answer to my question about canonicity, yes, I thought I would have a bit of fun. I now know not to ask direct simple questions to help us find answers in the future.
User avatar
Augustus
wisdom crystal finder
Posts: 2274
Joined: 11 Aug 2016 13:20

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Augustus »

Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik :D I know ya are close :D
User avatar
Jatsko
karma portal traveller
Posts: 5997
Joined: 26 May 2014 11:20

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Jatsko »

Ko9 wrote:Don't think you are putsmarting the skutnik :D I know ya are close :D
...I'm not trying to "outsmart" Mateusz, just asking a simple question, seeing him evade an answer, and then deciding to have a bit of fun.

My apologies if I'm coming across as someone who's tired of getting more and more pieces of this puzzle without any actual meaningful connections. I'm tired of playing the developer. I just want to play games that make sense.
User avatar
Sundex
subnet technician
Posts: 334
Joined: 22 Sep 2017 02:33
Location: The 8th Layer

Re: The Peter Navarre Crecy Evaluation

Post by Sundex »

Eh. I don't blame you. But some aspects should be considered. Although the game isn't canonical, it can still help us in our studies. How? That is for every individual who reads this to figure out for themselves.

That being said, I do hope for a game to reveal certain questions I have. (one of which I have already asked Mateusz)
BACK TO THEORIES
Post Reply